Kramer & Kaslow


C A L A B A S A S

23901 Calabasas Road
Suite 2013
Calabasas, California 91302
Phone: (818) 224-3900
Fax: (818) 224-3911

Home Page

Firm Resume

Attorneys

Franchise Articles

Internet Law

Entertainment Law

Legal Links



Philip A. Kramer
FranchisingBusiness LitigationEntertainment
Kramer & Kaslow is dedicated to providing quality legal services in a timely and cost effective manner. The firm engages in a sophisticated business practice with an emphasis on franchise law and business litigation. For more information refer to our firm resume or contact Philip A. Kramer .

Franchise Law
Developments in Franchise Law
Kramer & Kaslow represents and advises franchisees and franchisors on wide variety of matters. The Franchise Department's previously published newsletter identified some developments in this area of the law. Index of prior articles.


Kramer & Kaslow Argue Before Ninth Circuit
Ninth Circuit Rules Forum-Selection Clauses Are Unenforceable by California Franchisors
Kramer & Kaslow attorneys successfully argued before the Ninth Circuit in the precedent setting case of Jones v. GNC Franchising, Inc. At issue in Jones was the enforceability of the forum-selection clause in the parties' written franchise agreement. The clause required Jones to bring all actions in Pennsylvania, home of GNC's corporate offices. But, Jones, a California franchisee, brought suit against GNC in California state court. GNC removed the case to federal court and, relying on the forum-selection clause, moved to dismiss the action or transfer venue to Pennsylvania. Jones successfully argued that the forum-selection clause conflicted with California's public policy, and the District Court denied GNC's motions.

The Ninth Circuit affirmed. Section 20040.5 of California's Business and Professions Code provides that forum-selection clauses in franchise agreements are void. In addition to the express language of the statute, the legislative history establishes a strong public policy of California to protect California franchisees. Therefore, the forum-selection clause in Jones' franchise agreement, requiring him to litigate in an out-of-state forum, is against public policy and is unenforceable.

Full-text of the opinion in Jones v. GNC Franchising, Inc. (from the Ninth Circuit's website).



www.kramer-kaslow.com
Copyright © 2009
Kramer & Kaslow, PC

The information provided by this web site is for informational purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. Consult qualified legal counsel first before acting on this information. Transmission or receipt of information through this web site is not intended to create an attorney client relationship. Links to or from this site do not imply that either party endorses the other site, its publishers, or the information it contains.